Oh I'm fine with the price. But no matter how many parts in the campaign... playing one fucking race blows. I'd rather have them intertwined a bit. Let me know when you finish it if you feel "oh fuck I need to wait a year or two for the sequel" or if it's self-contained.

That's what I liked about SC2 and War3, it was self-contained. You didn't feel as if you were missing part of the story at the end.

Actually, there is a 10 mission protoss campaign to do. there is also supposed to be a 10 mission terran campaign in the zerg one, and a 10 mission zerg campaign in the protoss one.

So there are a total of 20 terrans and 10 protoss? That sounds closer to the 10/10/10 model that I actually think is the best to get accustomed to the different races/classes

Btw, how is it difficulty wise compared to the original SC and to War3? I thought the two first campaigns of War3 where way too easy, partly due to the hero classes.

There are 4 difficulty levels, on casual, every enemy is at 50% hp. on normal, everyone is equal. on hard the computer has upgrades and faster building then you, and on brutal they build even faster and have more upgrades.

I just finished the protoss mini campaign and it was unbelievable. The final mission in it is an absolute blast and damn hard even on normal. it's great fun!

Ahhh, good to see they did not go for a too slow learning curve then, which was the main issue with War3!

Adde me :

Puten
Character Code: 339

I was watching a couple of videos on youtube about player versus player games. Er... are most players playing like that?

Because the amount of micro-management they manage to do when developing/attacking/defending simultaneously is just insane.

It's really not as hard as you think, practice against computers. a few round against an insane computer and youll be pretty set. Although, its still nothing like playing a person.

Actually I just got my answer, the guy was telling that those are semi-pro games.

http://www.youtube.com/user/BlizShouter ... yPrdgNKmLQ for instance